I am writing this post for ClimateChangeWater.org with the hope that you will sign on to a letter to policymakers to help us send a clear message to the US Congress on pending legislation about the importance of protecting our wildlife and natural resources from the impacts of climate change.
Read More...

Tags: policy, united states

by Nick Sundt, WWF Communications Director for Climate Change
"While nations negotiate at international conferences about future global commitments to reduce greenhouse gases, and while Congress talks but continues to delay adoption of a strong greenhouse gas reduction program for the country, we're already seeing the effects of the pollution we put into the atmosphere since the start of the industrial revolution" said  New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson at the summit.  "That's why we have to  begin adapting to climate change today -- not tomorrow."

Read More...

Tags: nick sundt, united states, policy

Lou Leonard is a policy specialist with WWF-US, based in Washington, DC, who has been very actively involved in lobbying for the current Waxman-Markey climate change bill now in the U.S. Congress. His message goes out to all of us in the US who have been trying to reignite positive action by the US federal government for climate adaptation and mitigation in the past decade, which will mark a major shift in engagement by the US with the global debate about how to reduce the rate of climate change and begin to temper the worst impacts. — JM Read More...

Tags: united states, unfccc, climate adaptation, climate mitigation, waxman bill

Paul Fleming works on freshwater climate adaptation issues for the US City of Seattle, Washington. Seattle obtains much of its water from large rivers, and much of that water during the summer and fall is derived from the melting of annual snowpack — a process that is shifting rapidly as a result of climate change. Among his other responsibilities, Paul helps the city’s water supply utility think about how to manage their water resources in fiscally prudent, flexible ways, given that Seattle’s “normal” climate is altering rapidly. In early May, Paul spoke before the U.S. Congress in regard to the Waxman/Markey bill (discussed in several previous blogs here, most recently here) about the need for a National Climate Service — modeled in part on the existing National Weather Service. Such a group would likely focus on delivering analytical services for how climate is changing in critical parameters in particular regions — an excellent idea, which would be a great boon for facilitating and groundtruthing climate adaptation efforts. Below is his statement, as well as the statement of marine biologist Jane Lubchenco, who is now the head of NOAA, which is the agency that would host both the Weather Service and the Climate Service. Many thanks to Paul for supplying his remarks! — JM
Read More...

Tags: united states, waxman bill, climate adaptation, impacts, policy, water management

Climate adaptation is finally entering the consciousness of important policymakers, trickling up and through organizations. But these shifts are not occurring smoothly or without controversy and a lot of injured fingers and toes. And we seem to be moving towards two views of how to adjust to our emerging climate: “adaptation” and “Adaptation.” The state of conflict between these two views in the U.S. is globally important right now because the U.S. has been the silent watcher on climate issues for the last decade. The U.S. government has not substantively participated in climate talks, and because the U.S. economy is so large, competing economies must keep par — for good or ill. This rule is widely understood for climate mitigation issues (regulation of greenhouse gas concentrations), but it’s also true for climate adaptation costs as well, which will also become an increasingly major element of economic spending. Finally, U.S. policymakers are going to have this debate, probably as a result of the climate change bill introduced to the U.S. House of Representatives last fall.
Read More...

Tags: climate adaptation, policy, climate mitigation, north america, united states, united states

Climate adaptation is finally entering the consciousness of important policymakers, trickling up and through organizations. But these shifts are not occurring smoothly or without controversy and a lot of injured fingers and toes. And we seem to be moving towards two views of how to adjust to our emerging climate: “adaptation” and “Adaptation.” The state of conflict between these two views in the U.S. is globally important right now because the U.S. has been the silent watcher on climate issues for the last decade. The U.S. government has not substantively participated in climate talks, and because the U.S. economy is so large, competing economies must keep par — for good or ill. This rule is widely understood for climate mitigation issues (regulation of greenhouse gas concentrations), but it’s also true for climate adaptation costs as well, which will also become an increasingly major element of economic spending. Finally, U.S. policymakers are going to have this debate, probably as a result of the climate change bill introduced to the U.S. House of Representatives last fall.
Read More...

Tags: climate adaptation, policy, climate mitigation, north america, united states, united states