united states
Guest Blog: An Urgent Update and Message on Waxman-Markey
24/06/09 14:38
|
Guest Blog: A National "Climate Service"?
19/06/09 18:08
Paul Fleming works on
freshwater climate adaptation issues for the
US City of
Seattle, Washington. Seattle obtains
much of its water from large rivers, and much of
that water during the summer and fall is derived
from the melting of annual snowpack — a
process that is shifting rapidly as a result of
climate change.
Among his other
responsibilities, Paul helps the city’s water
supply utility think about how to manage their
water resources in fiscally prudent, flexible ways,
given that Seattle’s “normal” climate is altering
rapidly. In early May, Paul spoke before the U.S.
Congress in regard to the Waxman/Markey bill
(discussed in several previous blogs here, most
recently
here)
about the need for a National Climate Service —
modeled in part on the existing National Weather
Service. Such a group would likely
focus on delivering analytical services for how
climate is changing in critical parameters in
particular regions — an excellent idea,
which would be a great boon for facilitating and
groundtruthing climate adaptation efforts. Below
is his statement, as well as the statement of
marine biologist Jane
Lubchenco, who is now the head
of NOAA, which is the agency that
would host both the Weather Service and the
Climate Service. Many thanks to Paul for
supplying his remarks! — JM
Read More...
Read More...
The U.S. Politics of Climate Adaptation: The Waxman Committee
12/04/09 10:39
Climate adaptation is finally entering the
consciousness of important policymakers, trickling
up and through organizations. But these shifts are
not occurring smoothly or without controversy and a
lot of injured fingers and toes. And we seem to be
moving towards two views of how to adjust to our
emerging climate: “adaptation” and “Adaptation.”
The state of conflict between these two views in
the U.S. is globally important right now because
the U.S. has been the silent watcher on climate
issues for the last decade. The U.S. government has
not substantively participated in climate talks,
and because the U.S. economy is so large, competing
economies must keep par — for good or ill. This
rule is widely understood for climate mitigation
issues (regulation of greenhouse gas
concentrations), but it’s also true for climate
adaptation costs as well, which will also become an
increasingly major element of economic spending.
Finally, U.S. policymakers are going to have this
debate, probably as a result of the climate change
bill introduced to the U.S. House of
Representatives last fall.
Read More...
Read More...
The U.S. Politics of Climate Adaptation: The Waxman Committee
12/04/09 10:39
Climate adaptation is finally entering the
consciousness of important policymakers, trickling
up and through organizations. But these shifts are
not occurring smoothly or without controversy and a
lot of injured fingers and toes. And we seem to be
moving towards two views of how to adjust to our
emerging climate: “adaptation” and “Adaptation.”
The state of conflict between these two views in
the U.S. is globally important right now because
the U.S. has been the silent watcher on climate
issues for the last decade. The U.S. government has
not substantively participated in climate talks,
and because the U.S. economy is so large, competing
economies must keep par — for good or ill. This
rule is widely understood for climate mitigation
issues (regulation of greenhouse gas
concentrations), but it’s also true for climate
adaptation costs as well, which will also become an
increasingly major element of economic spending.
Finally, U.S. policymakers are going to have this
debate, probably as a result of the climate change
bill introduced to the U.S. House of
Representatives last fall.
Read More...
Read More...